New arXiv Paper Models Offensive Security Tasks as Symbolic Language Manipulation

Global: What is the AGI in Offensive Security?

A paper submitted on 27 January 2026 by Youngwoong Cho proposes a formal framework that treats offensive security activities as instances of symbolic language manipulation. The abstract states that the work investigates whether (1) offensive tasks can be reduced to language representation and reasoning, and (2) powerful large‑language models (LLMs) are sufficient to handle such manipulation.

Formal Modeling Approach

The author models a target system as a deterministic state machine and represents a hacker as an interactive symbolic agent. This abstraction allows each step of an attack to be expressed in terms of state transitions driven by symbolic inputs.

Encoding Interactions as Finite Strings

According to the paper, every interaction within an offensive engagement can be encoded as a finite string, enabling the entire sequence of actions to be treated as a language problem. The formulation relies on standard concepts from automata theory and formal language analysis.

Research Questions Examined

The study frames two central questions: first, whether any offensive security task can be reduced to symbolic language manipulation, and second, whether existing LLMs possess the capability to perform the required reasoning. The abstract notes that the paper provides definitions and short lemmas to explore these questions.

Theoretical Contributions

In addition to the modeling, the author presents a series of lemmas that link the expressive power of LLMs to the complexity of the encoded attack strings. The abstract mentions an open discussion section that highlights unresolved challenges and potential extensions of the model.

Implications and Future Directions

If the proposed framework holds, it could influence how researchers design automated penetration‑testing tools, by leveraging LLMs to generate or evaluate attack sequences. However, the paper also acknowledges that practical deployment would require addressing issues such as model interpretability and security of the language models themselves.

This report is based on information from arXiv, licensed under Academic Preprint / Open Access. Based on the abstract of the research paper. Full text available via ArXiv.